... differences that make a difference ...
|
| Network |
|
Chanticleer Calls - September 15, 1999
![]()
"Chanticleer
Calls", a twice-monthly newsletter for discriminating readers, thinkers,
feelers, speakers, listeners, and cogitators.
IN THIS ISSUE:
SIGNS
ON THE ROAD
* * * * * * SIGNS ON, OR
NEAR, THE ROAD
AN EXPERIMENT
My daughter Stacy,
a high school junior, studies psychology this trimester as an elective.
She recently explained some of the neat experiments they’ve done in class,
primarily involving visual illusions that illustrate how our eyes/brain
can fool us. I suggested she try this experiment, which you might consider
if you have access to five minutes, three large bowls, and water.
Some of you are probably
sharp enough to speculate what happens. (But come on, go ahead and do it
for yourself anyway.) Your left hand, conditioned by the cold water, tells
you that the middle water is “warmer”; while your right hand, conditioned
by the comfortably hot water tells you the middle water is “cooler”. You
have only one stimulus – the middle bowl of water – but you have two different
sensory responses. Which one is “right”?
As I explained to
Stacy (who thought this was pretty, uh, “cool”), just like the left and
right hands in the experiment, we are each ‘conditioned’ by our past. Each
of us has lived through our own unique, no-two-the-same life experiences.
To every new situation or experience, we bring our own unique perspectives
and attitudes resulting from our past experiences. We therefore can’t help
but experience each situation uniquely from anyone else. If we fail to
recognize this – if we expect others to see or feel or smell or otherwise
experience something exactly the same as we do – then we forget the lesson
of the three water bowls:
This (warmer
water to the left hand) is not that (cooler water to the right hand);
or
This (high
school experience of a student from Harwood Junior High) is not that
(high school experience of a student from Euless Junior High);
This (what
I find “pretty”) is not that (what you find “ugly”).
This (what
I find “funny”) is not that (what you find “revolting”).
This (what
I find “offensive”) is not that (what you find “satirical”).
Etc.
* * * * * * “WATCH ME!”
While waiting to
meet someone for lunch recently, I watched some kids at a mall ice skating
rink. A little girl, probably about four or five, would skate a few feet
and then gleefully yell to her mother, “Mommy, watch me! Watch ME!”
I was just wondering
at what age we outgrew that desire to show others how we progress in learning
how to do something.
* * * * * * QUOTE:
“There are two
ways to slide easily through life: to believe everything, or to doubt everything;
both ways save us from thinking.” – Alfred Korzybski
* * * * * * CNBC reported that
The
London Times reported a story that “rising stress levels” were resulting
in an increase in what was termed “desk rage”. Presumably, “stressed out”
non-postal workers in England are, uh, “going postal” at work as the “stress
levels rise”.
Hmm.
This makes it sound
as if “stress” is something that blankets the offices like the London fog,
as if it’s blown in through the air conditioning ducts, or emitted from
the fluorescent lights, or carried in the signals of the BBC.
Is it possible to
measure “levels” of “stress”? And is “stress” out there .... in the office
... at the desk ... in the hallways? And what about “rage” – where is “rage”
found, and how is it measured?
Personally, I’d punt
a pound they're both caused by that damn kidney pie and warm ale.
* * * * * * The touring production
of “Ragtime” recently played in Dallas, prompting two contrasting letters
to the editor in the Dallas Morning News. While one writer lauded
the performance (“I was well pleased, as were the hundreds of others in
the audience”), another was less, well, “well pleased”: “We were expecting
a “happy” type of show, but were subjected to a horrible example of prejudice
and sorrow. I saw almost half of the people leave at the intermission,
as we did. I’m sure Tom Hughes [former managing director] would never have
allowed the “N” word to be used on a stage in Dallas.”
(Chorus):
“This (using
the “N” word in a play”) is not that (using the “N” word in ‘real’
life).”
“This (what
pleases me) is not that (what you find “horrible”).”
“This (a play
about prejudice) is not that (prejudice).”
* * * * * * While we’re on stage,
according to the Arizona Republic ... a Mesa Junior High School
was scheduled to produce the stage version of “Tom Sawyer” next month.
However, a parent expressed concerns about the script, concerns which were
validated by school district officials who deemed the play, “culturally
insensitive to Native Americans, women and religious groups”, and cancelled
the production. Which, of course, prompted the ACLU to “fire off a letter”
to the Mesa school district asking them to reconsider. The school district
believes its action is warranted, given a U.S. appellate court decision
on a case involving the novel _Huckleberry Finn_, in which the court “asserted
that schools can’t allow racially hostile environments to persist.”
The article states:
“In the case of the “Tom Sawyer” play, district officials became concerned
over such characters as Injun Joe, who is jailed for vagrancy, portrayed
as amoral and a robber and killer who carries a knife; females that are
flirtatious or homely; and a constable who is a redneck. In addition, religious
references are made and music played.”
“Redneck?” Did Mark
Twain actually use the word “redneck”? Quick, who can find a reference?
I thought he wrote during the black-and-white era.
COMMENT: Why
is it so easy for most people to grasp the notion that “beauty is in the
eye of the beholder”, but it’s so difficult for many of the same
people to get that “offensive” is in the ‘eye’ of the be-offended?
Or that “obscenity” is in the ‘eye’ of the be-obscened? Or that
“amoral” is in the ‘eye’ of the be-amoralled? Or that “flirtatious”
is in the ‘eye’ of the, uh, ... envious? (?)
COMMENT(2):
How is it that somebody can be classified a “Native Texan” and not
also be classified as a “Native American”? Who makes these rules?
* * * * * * AND FINALLY
... I had a few friends from Fort Worth over for dinner the other night.
I normally wear myself out getting ready for something like this, such
that I’m beat by the time they get here. I had promised to make my brother’s
famous recipe for paella, which involves
quite a bit of preparation. So this time, I divvied up the recipe and asked
each person to bring one or two of the ingredients, all prepared. When
they arrived, I was not as frazzled as I would’ve been so I could enjoy
the evening more. And the actual cooking was as easy as taking what everybody
brought and throwing it all together. (Well, not really.)
The moral of the
story ... friends will inevitably “bring something to the party”. But you
need to let yourself ask.
BUT YOU THOUGHT
...
“Excellent
observation on the grandpa in Braums--and the kids. Kids are much
more easily distracted from discomfort-- at an ice cream shop. However,
take them to the bank and see how quick they discover they are hungry,
hot, tired, bored, need to potty, etc!” – Cindy in Tulsa
“what does
the word cogitator mean....my teenage son and his friends say it has a
dirty connotation” – JB who cleans my teeth
“I also
wanted to add an observation about St. Louis teens and art, or perhaps
this can expand beyond our region. Recently, a 17 year old white male,
attending one of the "better" Jesuit high schools, living in one of our
more affluent areas of the suburbs, was killed while attempting to apply
paint from an arousal can [I believe she
means “aerosol can”, but having read some Freud .... <lol> ss]
to the side of a move set of train cars. The headline in the paper
read "Young Artist Killed." Television, radio and paper alike reported
on the tragedy of this young, aspiring artist, who was cut down in the
prime of his life while practicing his art form. Several stories
ran, showing this art. Interviews of his parents from their "mansion" (reported
in the St. Louis Post Distpatch), explaining their dead sons love of this
art. My reaction was more along the: since when is graffiti "art" and vandalism
"practice". Given my "city" point of view, I wondered if this young
man had been black, living in the city, going to one of our public schools,
would he had been termed an artist?” - Robbyn in St. Louis
“Fabulous,
absolutely fabulous! Keep me on your list and keep 'em coming...
“ – Denny in Los Altos, California
“You are
right about children learning to view the world with a critical eye..and
they learn this from the adults around them. I was wondering while reading
your description of the grandfather's behavior (and the children's oblivion
to all the irritants he identified) what it would be like to take a grandfather
from say Bosnia and put him in a Braums with the grandkids for the afternoon.
Oh my, he'd probably wonder at all the conveniences. Just going to Braum's
alone would be a treat for him. He would not care where he sat or the precise
temperature of the room. A short wait for his food would not phase him.
I think our culture has become so hypercritical of the world we live in.
We have been sensitized to feel free to speak out about any real or perceived
intrusion on "OUR LIFE". We drive faster, we eat faster, we just live life
fast. I try to have one night where my kids and I sit down and have a meal
together. You know, like Donna Reed did. It's a wonder I did not give up
doing this years ago. It's always a battle. "can we eat in front of the
TV?" ..no, "what do you want us to say?" (when asked about their day),
etc etc. But I persist, living in the fantasy that one day they will come
to the "family night" table with smiles on their faces and truly enjoy
this time we have together in the middle of our busy week. Maybe somehow
without realizing it, on the other six nights of the week I taught them
not to enjoy this seventh. Food for thought your story, thanks."
– JB in Tyler, TX
“i like
the flow of your First Edition; and, look forward to future editions.
i appreciate observations re: going-on-ness in communicating/governing
-- in the spirit of general semantics...and, i welcome your "takes" from
texas...” – Alan in Los Angeles
“okay what
is chanticleer.....i thought it was just a word you made up...although
with the leer at the end it too might have some dirty connotation!!!”
– JB who cleans my teeth
“there are
many of us here but i believe your article was only forwarded to a few
of us....give us time, we'll get it around...in fact, two of my friends
in Japan are subscribing and if they don't i'll just have to forward it
to them.” – MH in San Antonio, TX
“I can’t
believe you’re the same guy I was married to all those years. I had no
idea all that stuff was going on in your head.” CS in Bedford, TX
|
Site Search
|
|